In order to rectify the chaos of online car-hailing competition at low prices, many places have clearly proposed suspending payment models such as “one price” and “special price,” and require online car-hailing platforms to ban the use of the “one price” model to force drivers to take orders. The misuse of “one price” has indeed distorted the industry ecology, but simply stopping it is not a cure for the root causes. Dialectically, the “one price” model has unique advantages, and simply stopping it will not solve the fundamental problem. “One price” has been criticized because the malformed income distribution method reduces the income and motivation of workers. The key to governance is to ensure that benefits are properly distributed. Establishing a reasonable income distribution mechanism will not only make drivers' income more reasonable, but passenger rights will also be more protected. Only a win-win situation for all parties can push the industry into a healthy development path. Some places have already carried out useful experiments. For example, Kunming and other places require a reasonable upper limit on the platform's share ratio and publicly launch it, and many platforms have subsequently issued announcements announcing the reduction of commissions. As a key player in the online car-hailing industry, the platform should also fully recognize that roll prices are not a good solution. Only by promoting service quality upgrading, optimizing management and reducing comprehensive operating costs, and innovating ideas along the path of differentiation can they shape unique competitive advantages and seize development initiatives.

In order to rectify the chaos of online car-hailing competition at low prices, many places have clearly proposed suspending payment models such as “one price” and “special price,” and require online car-hailing platforms to ban the use of the “one price” model to force drivers to take orders. The misuse of “one price” has indeed distorted the industry ecology, but simply stopping it is not a cure for the root causes. Dialectically, the “one price” model has unique advantages, and simply stopping it will not solve the fundamental problem. “One price” has been criticized because the malformed income distribution method reduces the income and motivation of workers. The key to governance is to ensure that benefits are properly distributed. Establishing a reasonable income distribution mechanism will not only make drivers' income more reasonable, but passenger rights will also be more protected. Only a win-win situation for all parties can push the industry into a healthy development path. Some places have already carried out useful experiments. For example, Kunming and other places require a reasonable upper limit on the platform's share ratio and publicly launch it, and many platforms have subsequently issued announcements announcing the reduction of commissions. As a key player in the online car-hailing industry, the platform should also fully recognize that roll prices are not a good solution. Only by promoting service quality upgrading, optimizing management and reducing comprehensive operating costs, and innovating ideas along the path of differentiation can they shape unique competitive advantages and seize development initiatives.