-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%

On December 20, local time, the US Department of Justice once again disclosed two batches of court documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein, including some grand jury trial records, as well as judicial documents relating to the past cases of himself and his co-defendant Ghislan Maxwell. Of the documents released this time, at least 550 pages have been completely blacked out and cannot be read. One set of three consecutive documents with a total of 255 pages was completely obscured, while the other 119-page document marked “New York Grand Jury” was also completely blacked out. Additionally, at least 180 pages appear in “partially readable, partially obscured” files. Although the newly released materials include a number of photographs of famous people related to Epstein, images of the interior of his home, and investigation records involving serious sexual assault allegations, extensive revisions have already sparked dissatisfaction. The US Department of Justice responded that the relevant processing complied with procedural and legal requirements.

Zhitongcaijing·12/20/2025 17:49:00
Listen to the news
On December 20, local time, the US Department of Justice once again disclosed two batches of court documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein, including some grand jury trial records, as well as judicial documents relating to the past cases of himself and his co-defendant Ghislan Maxwell. Of the documents released this time, at least 550 pages have been completely blacked out and cannot be read. One set of three consecutive documents with a total of 255 pages was completely obscured, while the other 119-page document marked “New York Grand Jury” was also completely blacked out. Additionally, at least 180 pages appear in “partially readable, partially obscured” files. Although the newly released materials include a number of photographs of famous people related to Epstein, images of the interior of his home, and investigation records involving serious sexual assault allegations, extensive revisions have already sparked dissatisfaction. The US Department of Justice responded that the relevant processing complied with procedural and legal requirements.