Starting on the 19th local time, due to the requirements of a congressional bill, the US Department of Justice criticized the disclosure of hundreds of thousands of pages of archival documents on the Epstein case. However, it was discovered that at least 550 pages of content in the document published this time were completely blacked out, making it impossible to read at all. Many media and people ridiculed the US government's move as a complete “performance art”; the so-called “transparency” was just a political performance. At the same time, this batch of documents “heavily exposed” former President Clinton and the Democrats, yet rarely mentioned current President Trump, who was previously thought to have close ties with Epstein. In response, Democrats criticized the Justice Department for selectively publishing documents and deliberately concealing key information, while the Department of Justice insisted that it was “transparent.”

Starting on the 19th local time, due to the requirements of a congressional bill, the US Department of Justice criticized the disclosure of hundreds of thousands of pages of archival documents on the Epstein case. However, it was discovered that at least 550 pages of content in the document published this time were completely blacked out, making it impossible to read at all. Many media and people ridiculed the US government's move as a complete “performance art”; the so-called “transparency” was just a political performance. At the same time, this batch of documents “heavily exposed” former President Clinton and the Democrats, yet rarely mentioned current President Trump, who was previously thought to have close ties with Epstein. In response, Democrats criticized the Justice Department for selectively publishing documents and deliberately concealing key information, while the Department of Justice insisted that it was “transparent.”