On July 23, the Argentine Football Association officially stated that the documents mentioned in various reports are not a subpoena against Argentine Football Association President Claudio Tapia or Football Association Finance Director Pablo Tovigino. The subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida actually targets a third party, requiring that third party to appear before a grand jury and submit documents and communication records relating to various personnel, including the Association's officials. Therefore, the claim that Tapia or Tovigino was summoned to testify by the US judicial authorities is completely false, and the news that the two have had their phones and other electronic devices seized is completely untrue. The document did not impose any personal restrictions on the president and financial director of the Argentine Football Association, did not require the two to appear in court, did not impose any procedural obligation, and there was no record of the seizure or seizure of their personal property.

On July 23, the Argentine Football Association officially stated that the documents mentioned in various reports are not a subpoena against Argentine Football Association President Claudio Tapia or Football Association Finance Director Pablo Tovigino. The subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida actually targets a third party, requiring that third party to appear before a grand jury and submit documents and communication records relating to various personnel, including the Association's officials. Therefore, the claim that Tapia or Tovigino was summoned to testify by the US judicial authorities is completely false, and the news that the two have had their phones and other electronic devices seized is completely untrue. The document did not impose any personal restrictions on the president and financial director of the Argentine Football Association, did not require the two to appear in court, did not impose any procedural obligation, and there was no record of the seizure or seizure of their personal property.