On August 4, according to the WeChat account of the “Supreme People's Procuratorate”, the first criminal case of disrupting an artificial intelligence model in Beijing recently settled: Wang, an algorithm engineer after the 90s, was sentenced to 5 years and 10 months in prison and compensated the company for financial losses of more than 204,000 yuan for vandalizing a computer information system. At a time when data and computing power are viewed as core elements of new quality productivity, the value of this case is that for the first time, a judicial ruling set the coordinates for criminal law protection for the core assets of AI companies, and also sounded a wake-up call for data governance in the entire industry.

On August 4, according to the WeChat account of the “Supreme People's Procuratorate”, the first criminal case of disrupting an artificial intelligence model in Beijing recently settled: Wang, an algorithm engineer after the 90s, was sentenced to 5 years and 10 months in prison and compensated the company for financial losses of more than 204,000 yuan for vandalizing a computer information system. At a time when data and computing power are viewed as core elements of new quality productivity, the value of this case is that for the first time, a judicial ruling set the coordinates for criminal law protection for the core assets of AI companies, and also sounded a wake-up call for data governance in the entire industry.