According to reports, the second-hand idle trading platform issued an announcement on the homepage of the app admitting that it provides merchants with the ability to import products in batches in the back office of the merchant system, obtaining product data related to the transfer platform, and using and promoting it constitutes unfair competition. The announcement revealed that the case was tried in the first instance by the Beijing Haidian District People's Court. The case number was Beijing 0108 Minchu No. 62954; later it was tried by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court in the second instance. The case number was Beijing 73 Minzhang 1808. The court finally determined that the 95-point platform operated by Zhi Chao Company used the “batch import product” function to capture, store the data involved in the transfer platform, tamper with the transfer to prevent the removal of the bid, cover up the data source, and falsely advertise the “official inspection machine” constituted unfair competition. In accordance with the court ruling, Zhi Chao Company issued this statement, acknowledging that the relevant acts constituted unfair competition, and stated that it takes full attention to this matter and is willing to assume full responsibility. Zhi Chao said it has taken the initiative to comprehensively review and optimize the relevant technical functions to eliminate the impact caused by these acts.

According to reports, the second-hand idle trading platform issued an announcement on the homepage of the app admitting that it provides merchants with the ability to import products in batches in the back office of the merchant system, obtaining product data related to the transfer platform, and using and promoting it constitutes unfair competition. The announcement revealed that the case was tried in the first instance by the Beijing Haidian District People's Court. The case number was Beijing 0108 Minchu No. 62954; later it was tried by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court in the second instance. The case number was Beijing 73 Minzhang 1808. The court finally determined that the 95-point platform operated by Zhi Chao Company used the “batch import product” function to capture, store the data involved in the transfer platform, tamper with the transfer to prevent the removal of the bid, cover up the data source, and falsely advertise the “official inspection machine” constituted unfair competition. In accordance with the court ruling, Zhi Chao Company issued this statement, acknowledging that the relevant acts constituted unfair competition, and stated that it takes full attention to this matter and is willing to assume full responsibility. Zhi Chao said it has taken the initiative to comprehensively review and optimize the relevant technical functions to eliminate the impact caused by these acts.