Count stock has been on a tear, up almost 50% over the past month and closing today at A$1.55. Yet today’s earnings story is less about euphoria and more about whether the market is correctly pricing a powerful margin and profit shift. The headline is clear. Count delivered strong FY26 profit growth, with underlying net profit after tax rising to A$13.9m and an underlying EBITA margin near 20%, while also lifting its fully franked dividend to A$0.05.
Is Count a genuine earnings rerating story, or just a stock that looks cheap next to richer peers on a P/E of 21.5x? Compare that discount against cash flow and profit durability in the valuation analysis for Count.
Prefer clean visuals instead of scrolling through more earnings tables and ratios? See Count’s full financial picture in charts, including how its valuation compares with recent profit trends, in our company report for Count.
Bulls argue Count can turn its wealth, equity partnerships and services flywheel into a higher margin, higher quality earnings mix. FY26 goes a fair way to backing that up. Underlying EBITA margin is around 20% and Wealth EBITA margin is 33%, which lines up with the claim that higher margin wealth revenues can lift group profitability. Funds under advice sit at A$43b and funds under management at A$6.5b, with FUM up A$2.6b over 12 months, which supports the push toward platform and advice revenues. Cross sell is still early, with only 29% of firms using one or more services, yet Services EBITA is A$11.1m on A$33m of revenue. That leaves clear, measurable upside if penetration improves, so the flywheel story is not just theory but also not fully proven.
Bears worry that acquisition heavy growth and tech projects could erode margins and strain adviser capacity. FY26 results challenge some of that, but not all. Underlying EBITA rises to A$33.4m and net profit margin is 9%, while net operating cash flow is A$31.1m and Count finishes the year in a net cash position of A$26.1m. That points to disciplined funding so far. At the same time, risks are visible rather than hypothetical. Management flags Oracle integration as a near term drag on adviser capacity and acknowledges upward pressure on deal multiples. ASIC attention on advice structures and the need to rewrite Statements of Advice for Oracle show regulatory and execution risk are live issues, not just footnotes. The bear case on deal and technology complexity is not confirmed, but it is also not disproven.
After acquisition-heavy growth, margin targets and dividend moves, are these visible issues masking deeper structural pressures? Review the risk analysis for Count which shows 2 important warning signsIf Count’s margin shift, cash generation and dividend move have your attention, register for free with Simply Wall St and add it to your Watchlist to track the share price against fair value and wait for the entry point that fits your plan. After you own it, monitor Count alongside your other holdings in the Portfolio Command Center so you only see focused, high impact updates instead of day to day noise. For longer term context and fresh angles, tap into thousands of investor views through the Community and see how others are thinking about similar risks and opportunities. That way you can spot potential catalysts and red flags early and stay a step ahead of the broader market.
New ideas move fast and early breakout momentum can be gone before the crowd even notices. Check these fresh stock shortlists while the data still matters and get in early.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com