On September 4, in an interview with the 21st Century Economic Report reporter, Huang Haorui, founder of JU ACTIVE, said, “We have already filed a second instance appeal. We have received information today, and Lululemon has also filed an appeal.” In response, the reporter also sought evidence from Lululemon's side. At the time of press release, there had been no response. In August of this year, the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province handed down a first instance judgment in the trademark infringement dispute between Canada's Lululemon Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. against five entities including Zhejiang Jiyou Brand Management Co., Ltd., and rejected all of Lululemon's trademark infringement lawsuits. The five defendants involved in the case jointly operated the JU ACTIVE sportswear brand, which was founded at the end of 2024. However, it is worth noting that in this lawsuit, Lululemon made two core claims. One was trademark infringement, and the other was unfair competition. Lululemon claims competitive rights in its 20 clothing styles, and believes that JU ACTIVE's imitation of the above styles violates the provisions of Section 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and constitutes an act of unfair competition. In the first instance, the court also determined that the 18 clothing designs involved in JU ACTIVE's case constituted unfair competition, and ordered JU ACTIVE to pay compensation of 2.6 million yuan to Lululemon.

On September 4, in an interview with the 21st Century Economic Report reporter, Huang Haorui, founder of JU ACTIVE, said, “We have already filed a second instance appeal. We have received information today, and Lululemon has also filed an appeal.” In response, the reporter also sought evidence from Lululemon's side. At the time of press release, there had been no response. In August of this year, the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province handed down a first instance judgment in the trademark infringement dispute between Canada's Lululemon Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. against five entities including Zhejiang Jiyou Brand Management Co., Ltd., and rejected all of Lululemon's trademark infringement lawsuits. The five defendants involved in the case jointly operated the JU ACTIVE sportswear brand, which was founded at the end of 2024. However, it is worth noting that in this lawsuit, Lululemon made two core claims. One was trademark infringement, and the other was unfair competition. Lululemon claims competitive rights in its 20 clothing styles, and believes that JU ACTIVE's imitation of the above styles violates the provisions of Section 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and constitutes an act of unfair competition. In the first instance, the court also determined that the 18 clothing designs involved in JU ACTIVE's case constituted unfair competition, and ordered JU ACTIVE to pay compensation of 2.6 million yuan to Lululemon.