Qingshan Paper announced that in an administrative dispute where the company's invention patent rights were declared invalid, an appeal was filed with the Supreme People's Court against the first instance ruling. Recently, it received a final “administrative judgment” issued by the Supreme People's Court. The ruling rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. The patent rights involved in the case were not valid, and the company was responsible for 100 yuan of handling the case in the second instance. The patented technology involved in the case has not yet been put into large-scale production and application. The judgment does not affect the company's continued use of the relevant technology. The company has prepared full impairment of this series of patents in the previous year, and this judgment will not have a negative impact on the company's current and future profit and loss, or daily production and operation.

Qingshan Paper announced that in an administrative dispute where the company's invention patent rights were declared invalid, an appeal was filed with the Supreme People's Court against the first instance ruling. Recently, it received a final “administrative judgment” issued by the Supreme People's Court. The ruling rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. The patent rights involved in the case were not valid, and the company was responsible for 100 yuan of handling the case in the second instance. The patented technology involved in the case has not yet been put into large-scale production and application. The judgment does not affect the company's continued use of the relevant technology. The company has prepared full impairment of this series of patents in the previous year, and this judgment will not have a negative impact on the company's current and future profit and loss, or daily production and operation.