Reply stock has had a weak five year run, yet current checks suggest the shares may now sit close to their calculated intrinsic value while trading on earnings multiples that appear cheaper than that fair value mark.
The issue now is whether Reply’s recent share price around €112.10 already reflects its intrinsic value estimate, or whether the cheaper earnings multiples still leave some room for upside over time.
Compare where Reply sits on valuation by lining it up against 183 high quality undervalued stocks that our models identify as potentially trading below their calculated worth.
The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model here values Reply by projecting future free cash generation and discounting it back to today. On the latest twelve month numbers, the group produced free cash flow of about €266.3m. In this model, those cash flows are assumed to keep growing rather than shrinking over the next decade.
Plugging those projections into the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity framework produces an intrinsic value estimate of about €111.35 per share. Compared with the recent share price around €112.10, the DCF outcome points to the stock trading roughly 0.7% above that estimate, which appears more consistent with a fair value range than with a clear discount or premium.
On these cash flow assumptions, Reply appears to be trading close to its estimated fair value relative to the current share price.
Reply is fairly valued according to our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF), but this can change at a moment's notice. Track the value in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted on when to act.
The P/E ratio is a useful starting point for Reply because earnings are a key focus for how this IT group is valued.
Reply trades on about 15.9x earnings, which is slightly above the peer average of 14.5x but below the wider IT sector on roughly 18.5x. So the stock does not look stretched against similar businesses and still comes in cheaper than the broader industry benchmark.
The Fair Ratio model, which weighs factors such as profitability, size and risk, points to a P/E of about 32.2x for Reply. That is roughly double the current multiple, which suggests the shares screen as undervalued on this framework even after accounting for the mixed signals from peers and the sector.
On the P/E yardstick, Reply appears undervalued relative to what the Fair Ratio model suggests investors might typically be willing to pay.
See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.
Reply Narratives on Simply Wall St pick up from the valuation puzzle by spelling out which future paths for growth, margins and earnings would need to play out for the stock to be worth meaningfully more or less than today’s share price. Each narrative sets out the specific assumptions behind its fair value so you can track how those expectations stack up against the actual numbers reported over time on the Community page.
Share a Narrative on Reply's valuation and be one of the first voices in the Simply Wall St community to set out a clear, number driven case on where its growth, margins and execution go from here.
Lay out your assumptions, put a figure on what you think Reply is worth, then track how that thesis holds up as new results arrive.
Do you think there's more to the story for Reply? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
Reply looks roughly aligned with its Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value, so the market price already reflects the current cash flow outlook. The tailored P/E work still flags the shares as undervalued, which clashes with the more neutral overall valuation checks. That leaves the real swing factor as profitability and cash conversion. If margins and project execution remain resilient, the current multiple could hold or improve. On the other hand, any slip in those metrics would help explain why the stock stays only modestly rated.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com