If you had looked at Qt Group in late September 2025 and decided to sit it out while others debated its growth story and valuation, the past year might feel like a bullet dodged. For Qt Group shareholders, the loss over the past year was 27.7%, including dividends. That outcome now sits alongside later figures that showed higher revenue but a much thinner net margin, which raises a sharper question. What could you reasonably have challenged in the bullish and bearish assumptions at the time before any of this showed up in the numbers?
The easy part of this move is behind Qt Group. Zero in on 196 high quality undervalued stocks for companies trading below our estimates.
The shares cost €45.02 at the start of the period, and every debate about Qt Group circled around what that price already assumed about embedded devices and IoT demand.
The bullish view pointed to a Fair Value of €69, a rough guide to where the stock might trade if revenue grew 13.2% a year and profit margins reached 27.3% within three years. Supporters leaned on expectations that embedded-device and IoT projects would keep expanding Qt Group’s addressable market.
The more cautious narrative put Fair Value at €37.69 based on assumptions of 9.0% annual revenue growth, a 21.0% margin, and a 20.0x future P/E over five years. This camp focused on the risk that acquisition integration and higher personnel and R&D costs could keep net profitability lower than bulls hoped.
Qt Group reported total revenue of €51.224m in Q2 2025 and €61.261m in Q2 2026, which supported both bull and bear expectations that the top line could grow. The pressure point came on profitability. Net income slipped from €6.74m to €2.396m and net margin moved from 13.2% to 3.9%. That gap leaned toward the cautious case.
The key lesson is about which promise you trust most. If a thesis leans heavily on richer profitability, track net margin and absolute earnings in each report and compare them directly with the margin path embedded in the original forecast.
Qt Group trades at €33.02 today, down from €45.02 over the past year. The selected bullish Narrative still places its Fair Value above that level, hinging on a business that can convert embedded software demand into stronger earnings power.
The argument leans on Qt’s tools and QA products becoming more central to complex device projects. For the Narrative’s higher figure to hold, a buyer today would need to see long run demand for these products support meaningfully higher and more durable profitability.
"The broader shift toward more software rich devices and graphical user interfaces across automotive, consumer electronics, medical and other embedded markets supports demand for Qt's core development tools over time, which can feed through to higher license revenue and distribution license income. Rising software complexity and the spread of AI generated code are increasing the need for robust testing, which positions Qt's QA tools as a critical part of customers' workflows and can support growth in QA license revenue and potentially higher overall earnings."
Not everyone reads the same price the same way. → See the higher figure this Narrative lands on, and how it gets there
This company's disappointment is already part of the story. Your next idea could come from looking where the price and the possibilities still seem far apart. Here are three companies priced below our estimates.
Three companies from the same screener. Open every one of the 205 solid balance sheet companies →
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com