If you had decided on 2 October 2025 to avoid Bilibili after reading the split between bullish AI and advertising optimism and concerns over China’s shrinking youth audience and regulation, the following year might have looked very different. For Bilibili shareholders, the loss over the past year was 49.4%, including dividends. Faced with that outcome, which early assumptions about margins, user growth, or policy risk would you want to stress test more carefully?
Bilibili has already moved. Pinpoint other ways to investigate the theme among 18 cryptocurrency and blockchain stocks.
The shares cost US$28.89 at the start of the period, and anyone looking at Bilibili then had to choose between two sharply different stories that both sounded plausible.
The bullish view anchored on a Fair Value of US$36.98. This price level was implied by assumptions that AI-driven ad upgrades and durable marquee games would support above-industry advertising and e-commerce growth and lift profit margins from 0.8% to 13.7% by around 2028.
The bearish camp pointed to a Fair Value of US$19.94 and focused on China’s shrinking youth population and heavier regulation. This view argued that a smaller core audience and higher compliance costs could restrain user growth and keep long term profitability under pressure even if margins rose.
Bilibili’s Q2 2026 results gave bulls some support. Revenue moved from ¥7,337.69m in Q2 2025 to ¥7,939.92m in Q2 2026, and net income excluding extra items rose from ¥219.00m to ¥343.73m. Net margin shifted from 3.0% to 4.3%, which helped the profitability story but left a big gap to both camps’ long term margin ambitions. Overall, the evidence cut both ways.
The real lesson is where to look next time. The whole debate hinged on margin expansion, so the key test is whether net margin and absolute profit move together over several quarters, not just whether revenue grows or the share price moves.
Bilibili trades at US$14.44, with the selected Narrative’s Fair Value sitting above that level based on its own assumptions rather than any proven reality. The argument leans on strong engagement, AI tools for ads, and more varied income streams alongside cost control.
The key question is whether a buyer today believes that user engagement, AI-driven monetization, and diversification can support the kind of sustained profitability the Narrative sketches out. That is what would need to be true for this past year’s 49.4% fall to look like an opening rather than a warning.
"Robust user engagement, AI-driven monetization, diversified revenue streams, and operational efficiencies position Bilibili for sustained profitability and resilience against market and regulatory challenges."
One Narrative disagrees with today's price. → See where this Narrative says Bilibili should trade
Bilibili lives where attention starts. Your next step might be looking where attention is priced and measured.
Advertisers buying space on video platforms still care about one thing: tools that match messages to intent, not just demographics.
Another large platform focuses exactly on that problem. It sells search, video and app real estate bundled with data and AI models that sharpen ad targeting.
The same toolkit also helps businesses run documents, email and collaboration in the cloud. That mix turns ad demand into a broader need for computing power, software and security.
If Bilibili highlights audience time, this other player highlights how commercial that time can become when tied tightly to AI and cloud infrastructure.
One Narrative has already put a figure on it. → Uncover the company trading 21% below one Narrative's Fair Value
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com