The Bet ING Groep Holders Made
ING Groep spent much of 2026 in the headlines for its aggressive share buybacks and a subscription-style banking model that pushed fee income further into the spotlight. For ING Groep shareholders, the return from the start of the year was 24.7%, including dividends. If you were weighing a purchase on 1 January, what had to be true about ING’s ability to grow non-lending income and still run a disciplined balance sheet for that outcome to make sense?
The useful thing about a Narrative is that the reasoning is checkable: the assumptions sit beside the argument, and together they imply an estimated Fair Value you can disagree with.
The easy part of this move is behind ING Groep. Zero in on 195 high quality undervalued stocks for companies trading below our estimates.
The Argument You Would Have Been Weighing Up On ING Groep
The shares cost €24.01 at the start of the period, and the live question for ING Groep was how far it could really pivot away from plain interest income.
The bullish story put Fair Value at €27.92, 16% above the start price. It leaned on ING Groep lifting revenue by 9.0% with a 28.0% profit margin and a 12.5x future P/E from a bigger mix of fee income.
The more cautious view set Fair Value at €22.2, 8% below the start price. It focused on tighter regulations and pressure on long term profitability despite assumed 8.9% revenue growth and a 27.1% margin on a 10.1x future P/E.
What The Evidence Changed For The ING Groep Story
ING Groep’s global rollout of its subscription banking plans, alongside the Dutch launch, directly supported the optimistic case that fee income could take more weight in the mix. Q2 2026 results showed revenue of €6,004m and net income of €1,947m, with net margin rising to 32.4%. This also aligned with the more optimistic profitability assumptions.
The lesson for other banks is simple. When a thesis depends on non lending income doing more of the work, it is important to track fee line trends, product uptake and reported margin, not just headline profit.
What ING Groep’s Price Already Assumes After A 25% Run
ING Groep now trades at €29.04 from the start of the year, and the selected Narrative’s Fair Value sits below that price based on its own assumptions rather than any hard truth.
The Narrative leans on questions about buybacks, capital buffers and fee momentum. A buyer today is effectively assuming ING can keep growing income without stretching its balance sheet. How do the highlighted capital and funding risks weigh on that expectation?
"Heavy use of excess capital for dividends and share buybacks, including €12.5b of additional distributions over three years, can constrain future balance sheet flexibility if regulatory requirements or risk weighted assets rise further. This may limit loan growth and put pressure on future earnings."
One Narrative has put a figure on that disagreement. → See the Narrative with its lower Fair Value, assumptions and all
Where ING’s Story Connects Next
You have ING Groep on your screen. Nearby, another banking model tackles similar questions about fee resilience and capital use.
This other institution leans on payments, trading and asset management activity. It tries to convert broad client relationships into recurring service charges.
Large financing programs for technology, security and infrastructure give it more ways to earn fees and interest. That activity mix can help smooth results when markets feel less friendly.
It is also spending heavily on technology and operations to support that reach. The open question is whether that higher cost base still leaves enough earnings power to justify the ambition.
One Narrative has already put a figure on it. → Uncover the company trading 20% below one Narrative's Fair Value
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com