If you had backed Inter & Co on the promise of its 60/30/30 Plan and bullish analyst targets, the past year likely felt very different to what those slides implied. Holding Inter & Co over the past year would have meant a 56.5% loss, including dividends. If that decision date was 12 November 2025, what exactly did the original thesis around 15.0% revenue growth, 28.0% margins and a 15.0x future P/E fail to factor in?
The useful thing about a Narrative is that the reasoning is checkable: the assumptions sit beside the argument, and together they imply an estimated Fair Value you can disagree with.
If the move has made Inter & Co harder to judge, start where the gap is still open and scan 32 high quality undervalued stocks.
The shares cost US$9.9 at the start of the period, and you were choosing between two very different stories about Inter & Co.
On the bullish side, the "Inter&Co 60/30/30 Plan" narrative set a fair value of US$33.3, built on assumptions of 15.0% revenue growth, a 28.0% profit margin and a future P/E of 15.0x over roughly 3 years.
The bearish case, "Regulatory Tightening And Competition Will Undermine Prospects Despite Network Effects", pointed to a fair value of US$4.17 and highlighted heavier regulatory costs and rising competition as key risks to profitability and market share.
Inter & Co hit its Rule of 50 goal in Q2 2026 with net revenue and ROE together reaching that yardstick, while revenue rose from R$1,433.8m to R$1,775.5m and net income increased from R$315.1m to R$421.1m. A higher net margin, from 22.0% to 23.7%, supported the profitability story, yet regulatory and credit cost warnings kept the cautious case alive. Overall, the evidence pointed in both directions.
The key assumption here was that efficiency and ROE would track the 60/30/30 and Rule of 50 targets. For any other banklike fintech, readers can test that same claim by comparing management scorecards with reported ROE, cost ratios and credit quality each quarter.
Inter & Co trades at US$3.96 after a 56.5% fall over the past year, while the analyst consensus Narrative on Simply Wall St puts its Fair Value above that level based on current assumptions.
The Narrative leans on Inter & Co’s super app, secured credit mix and funding base. A buyer today would need confidence that user growth, collateralized lending and cost of risk can all support the implied ROE path.
"A key focus is whether Inter & Co can successfully increase its exposure to secured and higher yielding credit while keeping cost of risk, funding cost, and operating expenses in balance so that ROE and efficiency targets remain achievable."
Not everyone reads the same price the same way. → See the higher figure this Narrative lands on, and how it gets there
This company's disappointment is already part of the story. Your next idea could come from looking where the price and the possibilities still seem far apart. Here are three companies priced below our estimates.
Those are three of them. See every one of the 23 solid balance sheet companies →
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com